Campaigning for a global development framework
after the Millennium Development Goals

Criteria

Please rate the draft below and send your feedback by using the form below!!!

This section provides a draft of the Criteria of the framework (see here and below). The criteria provide the basis for a systematic evaluation of the different elements of the framework, ensuring that they are consistent with our values, and combine to form a coherent framework which can achieve our purpose and drive sustainable change towards our vision.

(NB the guding questions below are just examples to illustrate how the table would work once populated).

Criteria (Darft v.2.0)

 

Framework Criteria evaluating overall coherence of the group of goals selected to achieve our purpose and secure progress towards our vision

Goals Criteria

evaluating each goal proposed

Targets Criteria

evaluating the targets identified under each goal

Indicators Criteria

evaluating the indicators identified to measure progress against targets and goals in order to achieve our purpose

Implementation Criteria

evaluating proposed methods and approaches used to implement action to achieve targets, goals and purpose

Foundation Values

Environmental Sustainability

1) Does the framework specifically recognise global resource constraints?
2) Does the framework clearly identify future generations as stakeholders in current decision-making?
3) Does the framework clearly link with existing environmental frameworks and processes

Poverty Eradication

1) Does the framework clearly define what is meant by poverty and is this a holistic definition?
2) Does the framework establish the eradication of poverty as a core part of its purpose?
3) Does the framework expressly link absolute poverty with comparative poverty and the common causes?

1) Is the monitoring framework clearly targeted at eradication and not reduction?

Human Rights

1) Does the goal reference and is it consistent with international human rights law and standards?
2) Does the framework actively contribute to progressive realization of these rights?
3) Does the framework clearly establish how it will empower individuals to be active agents of change and not passive recipients of “development interventions”?

Equity and Inclusion

1) Does the framework clearly identify equality of outcomes as part of its purpose?
2) Does the framework identify ways in which equity will be reached and measured across its entirety?
3) Does the framework identify specific groups it seeks to ensure are included and does it provide clear rationale for the selection of those groups?

1) Does each target clearly set expected milestones towards greater equity and equality within the goal?

1) Does each indicator allow for the collection of data disaggregated by key marginalisation factors such as by gender, disability and by age…

Global Responsibility

1) Does the framework clearly identify roles for all states? (other actors?)
2) Do each of these roles have equal responsibility and accountability mechanisms?
3) Are all actors held responsible for all actions, or each for their own?
4) Does the framework clearly establish changes in consumptions patterns required in wealthier countries?

 

Implementation Values

Accountability

1) Does the framework set out clear accountability for each goal and the framework as a whole at the national, regional and international levels?
2) Does the framework set out a clear and transparent reporting and review process?
3) Is the accountability mechanism inclusive of a range of stakeholders, including civil society and people living with poverty?

1) Is the monitoring framework clearly targeted at eradication and not reduction?
2) Does the indicator framework as a whole set out specific accountability mechanisms for different state, private, civil society and multinational actors?

1) Does the framework establish milestones for each target and clear accountability mechanisms should progress go off track?
2) Reporting must have maximum transparency of source and use of data.
3) Is the framework based on a systematic disaggregation of data by groups listed above – as well as groups specifically relevant within a national context?

Evidence-Based

Effectiveness

Participation

1) Has the framework demonstrated how it has included stakeholders in its development, particularly people with experience of poverty and marginalisation?

1) Are clear mechanisms established by which stakeholders hold each other to account – particularly the role of people living with poverty in holding state actors to account under international human rights law and standards?

You can see the previous version (v. 1.0) of this statement here.

What now?

You can rate the current draft of the criteria and send your feedback by filling in the form below.

Whenever the satisfaction levels on these sections dip below 50%, this will trigger an automatic redraft. There will also be pre-established moments for rewriting, notably ahead of key advocacy moments (eg. January 2013 – ahead of the HLP report, June 2013 – ahead of the UN Special Event, and one further date to tie in with Open Working Group decision-making). You will find more information on this process in Beyond2015's Content Strategy here.

All comments

METANG Paulette, BEYOND 2015 NGOS COALITION
Monday, May 20, 2013 - 12:58
10
As for me, all is relevant and clair.
John Fajimi, Project Hope Nigeria
Wednesday, May 29, 2013 - 08:30
8
We may need to include time-line along the path of our monitoring to ascertain progress
Katie Davey Dalsgaard, VSO International
Wednesday, May 29, 2013 - 17:34
8
A good and thorough approach, which VSO can support! Let us know when you want feedback on the content of the guiding questions for each criteria.
ZIA UR REHMAN, AWAZ Foundation Pakistan: Centre for Development Services
Thursday, May 30, 2013 - 08:57
Does the framework suggests clear guidelines for States to strictly keep their promises and commitments? will their be any position for assessment of progress, funding commitments by States and others in the midway ? will their be any position to go back to people for consultations in the midway?
azeez tajudeen olayemi, JONGO Farmers Group
Saturday, June 1, 2013 - 23:30
7
The frame work is fair, but if time -line could be included any proposed projects might escape time suffering.

Tell us what you think

This is a living document, and we encourage you to tell us what you think about the four sections.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
 
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Average rating

82.9/100

Document structure

Latest comment

quote

The frame work is fair, but if time -line could be included any proposed projects might escape time suffering.

Posted on 06/01/2013 - 23:30