Campaigning for a global development framework
after the Millennium Development Goals

Values

Please rate the draft below and send your feedback by using the form below!!!

This section provides a draft of the Values of the framework (see here and below). The Values represent elements that are integral to our Vision – a world where these Values are embodied – and they are also the means by which we will achieve our Purpose: They guide the creation of a coherent framework by framing the criteria through which we select goals, targets and indicators which are relevant, transformational, evidence-based and effective. The values also govern the process of implementation of the framework.

Values Statement (v. 2.0)

Foundation Values

Environmental

Sustainability

  • The framework must specifically recognise global resource constraints and should aim at a more equitable distribution of resources in addition to sustainable use of renewable and non-renewable natural resources.
  • The framework must set out how it meets the rights and needs of future as well as present generations.
  • The framework must incorporate the precautionary principle – the burden of proof that an action or policy is not harmful to the public or the environment should fall on those taking the action.
  • The framework must promote an enabling environment conducive for people to live in harmony with themselves and nature.
  • All goals and targets must be consistent with environmental sustainability.

Human Rights

  • The framework must be wholly consistent with international human rights law and standards, address injustice, and demonstrate how progress towards its goals will also allow progressive realisation of these rights
  • The framework must embrace a holistic, rights-based approach to development that is based on equality, equity and inclusive participation, ensures that the most marginalized can benefit from development and growth, and must empower all to be active agents of change.

Poverty Eradication

  • The framework must demonstrate throughout that it is aiming at the eradication, not simply the reduction, of extreme poverty.
  • Poverty eradication must be embedded in all goals and targets which, in turn, must aim to ‘get to zero’ rather than percentage reductions.

Equity

  • The framework must promote reductions in inequality within and between nations
  • Progress must be aimed at entire populations, not percentage improvements, ensuring that ALL are included and not only those most “easy to reach”. Consequently, the framework must deliver action which specifically targets those who are most marginalised and vulnerable (as a result of intersecting factors including age, gender, disability, ethnicity, geographic location and others), ensuring that they are equally included in the implementation and outcomes of the framework.
  • The framework must require the disaggregation of data across all goals, targets and indicators and other mechanisms to track the inclusion of those who are marginalised, and to measure improvements in equity and equality.
  •  Reporting on progress will require reporting against each goal and target in both absolute and relative terms and success will only be reported for goals which show improvement in equity as well as absolute terms.

Global Responsibility

  • The new framework must recognise shared global challenges and include the obligations, ownership and accountability of every country to respond to the needs of ALL, for example assessing the sustainability of existing consumption patterns in light of the need to promote well being and equity and collectively keep consumption within the limits of our planet’s resources. 
  • Contextualised national targets are needed for different countries, reflecting different challenges and strengths, and inspired by the principle of common but differentiated responsibility.
  • The framework must be coherent overall, with goals and targets promoting synergies between sectors and contributing to a holistic and collective approach to achieving our purpose.  

Implementing Values

Accountability

  • The framework must set out enforceable accountability and transparency mechanisms and processes at national, regional and global levels. This must include national oversight and independent review mechanisms at the international level with multi-stakeholder participation.
  •  The framework must include monitoring mechanisms with reliable, comparable and disaggregated data (both quantitative and qualitative) and baselines.  These mechanisms must also operate with maximum transparency of source and use.
  • The responsibilities of different actors, including, civil society, governments, multilaterals and private sector actors, must be clearly reflected at all levels of the framework so that actors are able to hold one another to account.
  • Monitoring processes must promote a deep, holistic view of development, sustainability and justice, and must avoid reducing the framework to simplistic measures.

Evidence

  • The framework must be clearly defined and based upon the experiences of people living in poverty and marginalization through their direct input into the process and outcomes, recognising these individual experiences are more than “anecdotal evidence”.
  • The framework must be demonstrably based on lessons from the MDGs including national and global reporting processes such as the outcome document of the 2010 MDG summit
  • The framework itself, during the implementation period, should be open to monitoring feedback loops which suggest changes of emphasis or a refocusing on specific aspects at the global or national level.

Effectiveness

  • The framework must represent a coherent set of goals, targets and indicators which will be effective in ensuring that the structural causes, not just the symptoms, of poverty, inequity and environmental degradation are tackled.
  • The framework must be ambitious and achievable, with the potential to deliver demonstrable and sustainable progress within the agreed timeframe, dependent on collective international, regional and national effort.
  • The framework must be clearly communicated so that it can be understood in the same way by all actors.
  • The framework must clearly indicate the mechanisms, processes and resources required for its effective implementation by different actors at all levels. 

Participation

  • The framework must reflect and support the active participation of ALL people in their individual and collective development process.
  • The development, monitoring, re-planning and implementation of the framework must be based on extensive consultation involving all stakeholders especially people living in extreme poverty and marginalization.

You can see the previous version (v. 1.0) of this statement (formerly known as "Principles") here.

What now?

You can rate the current draft and send your feedback by filling in the form below.

Whenever the satisfaction levels on these sections dip below 50%, this will trigger an automatic redraft. There will also be pre-established moments for rewriting, notably ahead of key advocacy moments (eg. January 2013 – ahead of the HLP report, June 2013 – ahead of the UN Special Event, and one further date to tie in with Open Working Group decision-making). You will find more information on this process in Beyond2015's Content Strategy here.

All comments

Seth Le Leu, World Vision New Zealand
Tuesday, March 26, 2013 - 22:54
8
I wonder whether we need to include something on fragile states. I know getting specific poses some problems as you start a huge raft of other special interests. I guess the whilst a lot of the developing world has immensely befitted from the MDGs. Should we see that failed states and those exhibiting trends towards failure need special focus. A failed state in a region destabilises the whole region as well as denying its people the rights we want for all people. A huge issue would be around the practice of religious freedom which is an intrinsic human right. Religion is a solace to the vast majority of the world's population and is one of its most divisive of forces. Does religion need special emphasis owing to its potential to mend or destroy human advance?
Nathan Cantley, Medsin-UK
Thursday, May 16, 2013 - 12:46
5
I think something that is big and missing from that list of values is HEALTH. It is a huge part of the work that is happenning around the world and considering that 3 of the MDGs were health based I think it is important that it is included here. Especially since Universal Health Care is a hugely debated topic and it is something that can be worked on both in developed and developing countries. But again that is just my opinion.
METANG Paulette, BEYOND 2015 NGOS COALITION
Monday, May 20, 2013 - 10:49
10
I think here we are missing stressing on values such as health. We should add it
adolfo G. Familia M., CRUZ ROJA DOMINICANA
Friday, May 24, 2013 - 20:57
Mi opinión: después de la ultima revisión me dado cuenta de la gran cantidad de persona que consolidan en un mismo propósito a esto yo le llamo trabajo en equipo FELICIDADES
Wanjiku ngunjiri, Sub Saharan Africa Research and Policy Institute (SARPI)
Monday, May 27, 2013 - 07:26
9
Its perfect. I wanted us to capture 'good governance' including integrity (absence of corruption) but I think its all included.
Denis LeBlanc, Independent Activist Canada
Tuesday, May 28, 2013 - 22:09
5
Again, the word "actors" is not correct English language use. Using "parties" would be better. I don't see the Private sector mentioned. Business and and the financial sector, in particular large multinational corporations and banks have a huge part to play in development and in achieving equity. It's best not to forget that profit is frequently the only motivating factor for this sector. Unless this process is simply an intellectual exercise, business must "buy in" at every level.
Katie Davey Dalsgaard, VSO International
Wednesday, May 29, 2013 - 15:29
9
Excellent work! Only comment is that a little more detail could be added to the "Participation" value, here VSO thinks we can go a bit further than simply asking for consultations. We would therefore like to see the following reflected in the values: • Participatory process, from design through to adaptation, implementation and accountability, including through forging partnership with marginalised people; combining objective with self-reported indicators that can track norms and allow people to speak for themselves; and support for volunteering as a means of implementation of the framework.
Kemberley Gittens, Caribbean Policy Development Centre
Tuesday, June 4, 2013 - 04:08
Environmental Sustainability - the framework should recognise the CBDR of states and special and differential needs of, and related capacity building and adaptation requirements of, states with special environmental/development considerations, for example, Small Island Developing States. The CSO and NGO community has always been closely aligned to the SIDS agenda which was articulated in the Barbados Programme of Action (BPOA) adopted in 1994, further complemented by the Mauritius Strategy of Implementation (MSI) of 2005 and MSI+5 Outcome document. SIDS are confronted by development challenges similar to those of developing countries in the main, but these are exacerbated by SIDS-specific vulnerabilities, rendering the difficulties they face in the pursuit of sustainable development particularly intense and complex. The unique challenges facing SIDS within the context of sustainable development were first formally recognized by the international community at the UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), also known as the Earth Summit, held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil in 1992. The special case of small islands and coastal areas was highlighted in Agenda 21 – the programme of action for sustainable development adopted as an essential outcome of the conference. For additional context and recommended actions visit http://www.un-documents.net/sids-act.htm UN Documents Gathering a body of global agreements: Programme of Action for the Sustainable Development of Small Island Developing States

Tell us what you think

This is a living document, and we encourage you to tell us what you think about the four sections.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
 
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Average rating

80.0/100

Document structure

Latest comment

quote

Environmental Sustainability - the framework should recognise the CBDR of states and special and differential needs of, and related capacity building and adaptation requirements of, states with special...

Posted on 06/04/2013 - 04:08